Chat Logs

  1. bluehi phaleth
  2. phalethhi blue
  3. phalethit's too bad that one can just reconstruct/regenerate the private key https://mcpherrin.ca/2026/09/07/rsa.html
  4. nevetI’ve factored the RSA keys of a Certificate Authority…
  5. bluehalol
  6. bluephaleth: so this guy found out RSA relies on factoring large primes?
  7. bluethe thing everyone has known for the last 30 years?
  8. blueis this guy columbus?
  9. phalethI think what he says is RSA 1024 keys are almost broken at this point in time
  10. blueyes, this has been known for a looooooooooong while
  11. blueI just don't know what these clowns are trying to say with those posts. rsa factorisation problem is common knowledge, and key sizes have increased in response to cracking speed rise
  12. blueI was at uni in 2015, they already warned us about key sizes with RSA
  13. bluethis has been a cat&mouse situation ever since we have RSA
  14. phalethgood uni, I guess that post is mostly trying to educate, it's too bad that the old traffic might just be decrypted someday
  15. bluetrue
  16. bluewe all need to move to 6-say validity certs pahelth
  17. bluephaleth*
  18. bluete shorter the time, the better reaction we have
  19. blueI call this, "security by breakage"
  20. phalethI think there are still better cyphers, such as X448, which for example haproxy supports, but the CAB forum is a bunch of morons
  21. phalethlowering down the lifetime of certs means depending more on CAs
  22. bluetrue